Brought to you from the Chinese side of the anti-CNN forum. This video does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the poster.

[ Last edited by Davo at 4-6-2008 10:28 ]

*sigh* yet more examples of crappy photographs and even worse editing. Seriously, when are you going to come up with anything original? We all know that the 'West' got the wrong end of the stick (in part due to not being allowed access by the government, mostly due to exaggerated reports from unreliable sources) and screwed up on the tibet issue, but what else have they done? Wher is the 'Anti-China Bias' that is supposed to exist? So there was a cock-up. Big deal!!! People responsible have apologised and owned up for their mistakes (after first being exposed by Chinese citizens ) and so the world goes on. I can see no evidence of any bias in this video, only shoddy reporting. That said, good use of the Mario music!! Oh, and the whole 'China is holy and inviolate' part; well... Says who? Hate to burst your bubble, but- 1.3 Billion Chinese, 4.7 Billion others. Now who looks small?

sorry,flamingmonkey,it is a little agressive, just because we have nothing but only this to fight back though you think this kind of video is very very harsh and uncomfortable.This is only way we can express ourselves. BTW,I think this video,especialy the music,is excellent(of course from the Chinese perspective) [ Last edited by filookm at 20-5-2008 19:24 ]

Quote:

Original posted by flamingmonkey at 20-5-2008 13:34 *sigh* yet more examples of crappy photographs and even worse editing. Seriously, when are you going to come up with anything original? We all know that the 'West' got the wrong end of the stick (i ...

I sure hope you're attacking the video and its creators, not the messenger.

Flaming monkey does have good points. However, I protest on the numbers because it should be 4.7 billion minus one . Samtom is a bit frustrated with the issues at home.

I don't kown what should i say? Brought to you from the Chinese side of the anti-CNN forum. This video does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the poster.