My knowledge of the human rights conditions in the area of Tibet are irrelevant. The fact that some people want to be freedom from the Chinese Government, a government with a poor record in that regard, is perfectly understandable. That's the issue. No matter if it's better for them, or worse, it's about CHOICE. Something I feel many Chinese, though I love them dearly, have a big problem grasping the concept of. You NEED choice in your life. Once you have it, you will do anything to protect it. I support the idea of people having choice.
China's problems are in the spotlight, even more so because it's hosting the Olympic Games. The issue in China is more serious given the number of people affected and the type of problems they face. This racist garbage you like to chew on is also a joke. Japan and Taiwan aren't being picked on. Nor is India. It's convent for you to play the race card. That is a sign of weakness on your part. If someone has a problem with you, if feels better for you to call them a racist rather than deal with the real issues. I see right through you.
Who the Tibetans choose to follow is their business, though that doesn't mean ALL will want to follow the same path. In the case of Bush, or any other president, we elect the person we think best represents us. It's impossible to pick someone everyone will agree with, but the general idea is that you can make at least a majority of the people content. While many Americans supported Bush in the beginning, the war changed the way a lot of people feel about him, as is natural. Currently, he does not represent the true will of the USA. However, that's why we have elections, and term limits. Bush can NEVER again be president. As of next year, his time is over. The answer to your question is yes to both sides. You seem to be the type of person that think in a binary fashion. Everything is straightly yes/no, right/wrong, black/white. I find that the hallmark of an unreasonable person. This is why you posed a question that was designed to make me look wrong no matter which path I choose. I am not impressed.
In turn, if the Dali Lama did things that displeased a majority of the people who support him, it would be good of them to find someone they did support. Again, a concept I expect you to not be able to relate to. You have ZERO say over your government, and your leaders. Maybe if that bothered you, you'd understand how the people in Tibet might feel.
I checked out the website, it's really trashy. If I wanted that kind of garbage, I'd look at a few 9/11 conspiracy theory websites, Nazi Shrunken Heads, or KKK material. This website is like something the Nazi party would have created to slander the Jews. You should study some early Nazi propaganda. You'd see some disturbing parallels. I think it's funny the site is hosted in China. Because it's OK to have a website that slanders the Dali Lama, but if you tried to host a website that showed him in a positive light? Website blocked, shut down, and you'd probably end up under house arrest, or worse.
As disgusting of a person I think you are for supporting that website, even you don't deserve to be imprisoned for believing in something. As the old saying goes, “gotta take the bad with the good”.