11 12
Thread
Print

[Translation] German Channel N-24 posting fake pic once again

This topic has been highlight by uglyrain at 24-4-2008 12:06.

[Translation] German Channel N-24 posting fake pic once again

This article is translated from Anti-cnn.com Chinese Forum, http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/cn/thread-32066-1-1.html




To convey the viewpoint of their news better, Channel N-24 in Germany posted a fake pic again. And this time round, they found out something new. What they used was taken years ago.



News Source: http://www.n24.de/news/newsitem_766679.html
News Archieves: N24 Propagandaschlacht - China beginnt in Tibet mit Umerziehung.rar (935.04 KB)
N24 Propagandaschlacht - China beginnt in Tibet mit Umerziehung.rar (935.04 KB)

2008-4-22 23:53



On Augest 21, N24 posted the news
Propagandaschlacht-China beginnt in Tibet mit Umerziehung (China's propaganda strategy in Tibet) with a photo of policemen and Tibetan monks. However,this photo is suspected to be taken a long time ago, before 2000.


Analyse:

1) The one at front and the one on left were wearing the uniform of Police. The epaulets showed that both of them were superintendent; and according to the collar badge, the one at right-hand side was an armed police. The three sets of uniforms were all the old version, which was designed in 1993 and had been abandoned in1999.

China Police Ranking System -- '95-'99 version


The epaulet of a second lieutenant of armed police.

2) The background of the photo seemed to be a Tibetan Buddism temple named Yonghe Palace in Beijing. Not in Tibet.

3) There are some obvious lapses in cropping. With a larger pic, look at the lips of the monk at left, the strange white edge of the middle monk's neck, the fuzzy edge between the head of the left monk and the police....


Response:

pidan29: The light shone upon the police at middle is strange....


llyy: It is obvious that the light source of the monks is different from the one that shines upon the polices.


先生皇: The uniform is the '93 version, but the two are not wearing their collar badges. This is prohibited. And this '93 version with cyan in color is abandoned in 1999 and they changed the uniform into the navy-blue color one.


月色千岛湖: The picture is obviously contradictory to the laws of perspective. It is most likely to be Photoshoped.



[ Last edited by uglyrain at 24-4-2008 12:04 ]

Attachment

112233.JPG (46.57 KB)

24-4-2008 12:02

PS analyize

112233.JPG

1184892790802_42423.jpg (41.43 KB)

24-4-2008 12:03

2007 Uniforms

1184892790802_42423.jpg

2008-04-22_173433.jpg (131.23 KB)

24-4-2008 12:04

N-24 German TV

2008-04-22_173433.jpg

TOP

Enlarged it by photoshop, the edge in white you will find, interesting!

TOP

photo attached for the recent news?

Is this photo related to the artical? The uniform of those polices were waring looks like this photo being shot long time ago.

TOP

ridiculous

the westen media are so ridiculous

TOP

while bad cropping can be due to negligence (though it shouldn't happen at all, especially when the guy doing it is a professional who is getting paid), the deliberate collaging of different photos is completely contradictory to the standards of journalism!! i am a photographer for my university paper and we are definitely not allowed to do it, unless the image is explicitly stated to be a "photo illustration." as someone who has used photoshop for a decade, i can easily tell that this image was put together from various photos. this is truly despicable.

TOP

I wonder how long it took for the film designers in Hollywood to prop the picture? It's impressive, but the box cover to the movie "Clover Leaf" is 1000X better.

-Samtom

TOP

Wow! the German media don't know how to use photoshop, ha...ha....ha......, or maybe Dalai don't pay them well to do the job...!!!

TOP

What worse than lier is bad lier, How stupid they are

TOP

Oh my oh my, the Award for the Giggest Liar 2008 goes to Germany!
Applause, applause...

TOP

Fake means that the picture is wrong. They dont say that this picture is new. Its used to Illustrate the CONTENT!
Where do they claim that the picture is new? Did anyone read the content of the text?

TOP

 11 12
Thread