维基百科——新的anti-cnn战线
由于以前维基百科由反华份子及台湾把持，所以国家是不允许我们进入的！但现在由于奥运开放了。让我们行动起来。。。把维基百科成为新的anti-cnn阵线。
维基百科是正常的一个网站，甚至可以说是互联网发展的里程碑，今天，我们应该占领这块阵线，以世界各种语言向世界描述一个真实的中国。希望网站能引起足够重视。
如：我编辑的一个词条:[url]www.anti-cnn.com[/url]
[url=http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Www.anti-cnn.com]http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Www.anti-cnn.com[/url]
大家也可以进去搜索！[url=http://www.anti-cnn.com]www.anti-cnn.com[/url]。另外，
我以anti-cnn的名义注册了帐户，同时更改了关于一西方势力下的狗的条目：
辛灏年[url=http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%BE%9B%E7%81%8F%E5%B9%B4]http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%BE%9B%E7%81%8F%E5%B9%B4[/url]现在效果如图：
[attach]59754[/attach]
百度缓存中的页面是
[attach]59755[/attach]
我估计很快又会被改回来。。因为我更改后3分钟不到，就被改了。。。我又第二次进行了修改。。
我编辑的内容是：
[color=red]辛灏年(真名高尔品)怎样诈取台湾退休老兵的退休金？[/color]
[color=red]高光俊[/color]
[color=red]因为我曾经帮助辛灏年办过政治庇护，所以我了解辛灏年的真实情况。这里披露一些，以便大家认清他的本来面目。[/color]
[color=red]1。辛灏年到处自称是教授。实际情况是：辛灏年本名叫高尔品，安徽人，写过几篇不出名的小说，后通过关系钻到武汉大学作家班学了两年。为了以所谓访问学者的身份出国，之前，他让在天津南开大学任副校长的哥哥非法为他弄了个副教授聘书，然后就自称辛灏年教授。大家可以问辛灏年是否如此？也可以到南开大学调查一下，问问有没有一个叫辛灏年或高尔品的副教授？他讲过一堂课吗？他领过一份工资吗？[/color]
[color=red]2。辛灏年公开声称是美国哥伦比亚大学的博士后研究员。请大家调查一下，哥大有这么个博士后吗？ ＜ r o l i a. n e t ＞[/color]
[color=red]3。辛灏年刚到美国时，比较穷，住在一个小老板家里。该老板同情他，让他在自家白吃白住。以此，该老板外出多日，辛灏年将该老板的老婆勾引上床。该老板回家后发现此事，将辛灏年赶走，接着与老婆离婚。该女人被丈夫休后，找到辛灏年，要求与其结婚。辛此时故意拿一把，不同意结婚。该女人认为辛破坏了她的家庭，坚持让辛娶她。辛灏年便装着很不情愿的样子取了该女人。结婚后，辛灏年常常当着外人的面讲，我当初本不愿意娶她，是她死缠着我，没办法采娶了她。[/color]
[color=red]现在，高尔品骗取台湾老兵周祥的退休金50万美元，开办曲线救共的《黄花岗杂志》，欺世盗名，两面讨钱，真是无行文人面目大暴露。[/color]
[color=red]由此可见辛灏年的人品。其他问题以后慢慢细说。[/color]
[color=red]文章来自：相约加拿大[/color]
[color=black]大家如果发现被修改了，可以去编辑，改回来。。凭我一个人改是没用的。因为维基需要大家的认可才会确认。。。[/color]
为了我们伟大的祖国，请anti-cnn重视这条战线，本人只能尽力而为。
另外：如果别人更改了你的词条，你怎么发现呢？
很简单，注册后更改词条，然后监视该词条。。。
[color=red][/color] 太快了。我编辑30秒后就改回来了。。。
大家注意，更改之后，可以在讨论区发表观点。。。
然后死盯着主题目词，等我们有人气了，就像维基抗议！ 由于别人的更改已经很久了，我们处在弱势的位置。。。
现在大家尽量用讨论说话。。
注意表达方式。。。
不要强行更改原词条。。。会被禁言和封IP地址。 看到了 不需要大量的去登陆注册,只需要少数的人在关键的时候发一些我们的声音就行了,把他们控制的网站炒红对我们没有什么好处.我们以AC为主要阵地不是一样取得了巨大的胜利,引起了全世界的关注么? 我也去凑了個熱鬧
改了~ 维基不是号称最自由吗？ 从来就没自由过 长期被反华势力把持着
维基中文基本是废物
除了政治发达 其他条目没内涵 这个网站可是M先生的至爱，我还以为这个网站真有什么货呢？原来是一个可以肆意侮辱污蔑中国的蜗居罢了，难怪M先生如此钟爱。 [quote]原帖由 [i]潇湘庸人[/i] 于 2008-8-21 23:52 发表 [url=http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/cn/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=1275272&ptid=88287][img]http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/cn/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
这个网站可是M先生的至爱，我还以为这个网站真有什么货呢？原来是一个可以肆意侮辱污蔑中国的蜗居罢了，难怪M先生如此钟爱。 [/quote]
你不去发表东西,就不要怪M先生.Q11) Q11) Q11) Q11) Q11) Q11) 建议ac开一个反驳维基中文的专用频道
不过估计也不会长，奥运后中国可能又把它关掉，玩他们下 [quote]原帖由 [i]accountant[/i] 于 2008-8-22 03:42 发表 [url=http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/cn/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=1275769&ptid=88287][img]http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/cn/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
你不去发表东西,就不要怪M先生.Q11) Q11) Q11) Q11) Q11) Q11) [/quote]
我们发表什么不重要，重要的是不该在上面出现的文字让他出现了
English version
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn[/url][b]Anti-cnn.com[/b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-0][1][/url]is a website established by Jin Rao, a 23-year-old Chinese student, inresponse to what it claims as "the lies and distortions of facts fromthe Western media" concerning the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Tibetan_unrest]2008 Tibetan unrest[/url] and the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_China]People's Republic of China[/url]'s national unity. The site says that its purpose is to "collect, classify, and exhibit the misbehaviors of Western media".[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-1][2][/url] According to the website, the phrase "anti-cnn" does not exclusively indicate its objection to the American company [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN]CNN[/url], but also to many other Western media sources, including the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC]BBC[/url], [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Spiegel]Der Spiegel[/url], [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Repubblica]La Repubblica[/url], [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-tv]n-tv[/url], [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild-Zeitung]Bild[/url], [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel]Fox News Channel[/url] and [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTL_Television]RTL[/url].The website also states, "We are not against the western media, butagainst the lies and fabricated stories in the media. We are notagainst the western people, but against the prejudice from the westernsociety."In the wake of the riots, western world journals had publisheddozens of pictures purporting to show the brutality of Chinese policein Tibet. Many of these pictures are reproduced at anti-cnn, whereclose scrutiny of the photos shows that in reality they are falselylabeled shots not from Tibet but of police actions in India and Nepal.
Anti-cnn also called attention to the fact that western media hadfrequently implied that it was the Chinese police, and not the rioters,who had killed people. Estimates of the death numbers were positionedalongside phrases like 'Chinese crackdown', giving the false impressionthat the Chinese authorities, not the rioters, were the source of theinjuries and killings.
Jin was invited to attend an interview show by the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Central_Television]China Central Television[/url]in the programme of Oriental Horizon (东方时空). The title of the show was"Warning to CNN: why the Chinese Internet folks got angry."(正告CNN：中国网民为何愤") During the interview, Jin said that he had establishedthe site "to expose the facts, to make the facts publicized to as manypeople as possible." The site now claims about 500,000 visits per day,60% of which are from China.[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-2][3][/url]
A [i][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Post]Washington Post[/url][/i]report detailing Chinese reactions to Western coverage quoted Jin assaying that more than 1,000 people have e-mailed him, volunteering tospot distorted reports in western media. A Chinese analyst said thatprotests may only push Chinese government to adopt a more hard-lineposition. The report ended with a comment from Michael Pettis, aprofessor of management, which said "as China becomes a world power,there is going to be a lot more scrutiny and criticism. Just asAmericans have learned to deal with it, the Chinese are going to haveto learn to deal with it. My hope is that after the anger there will besome reflection on the complexity of these issues."[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-3][4][/url]
Some of the media accused of making distorted reports have givenreplies. CNN made a formal response to the charges of the cropping ofcover pictures and mismatching captions, but asserted that theselection of material was "appropriate for the editorial context, andwill not cause any confusion".[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-4][5][/url]Der Spiegel mentioned the site in an editorial, where it referred tothe argument over the credibility of Western media on this particularissue with the headline "the war over words." Der Spiegel howeverrefused to respond to the charges made, implying that the site is partof "Chinese propaganda". They also blamed the Chinese government'smedia control policy, saying that it forces the media to turn to "hardto confirm" evidence and "increases the risk of making mistakes anderrors;" which in turn "makes it easier for the Chinese authorities toaccuse them."[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-5][6][/url]
This site first received global attention in the Chinese ForeignMinistry spokesperson Qin Gang's regular press conference on 27 March2008 when he was asked to comment on the website. One journalist putforward a question whether the Chinese government had financed orsupported the anti-cnn website. Qin Gang's response was that "It is theirresponsible and unethical reports that infuriated our people to voicevoluntarily their condemnation and criticism."[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-cnn#cite_note-6][7][/url]
[[i] 本帖最后由 luyi99 于 2008-8-23 23:19 编辑 [/i]] 看看现在的评论吧：“有人认为，该网站声张了正义，主张了中国人的权益。也有人[4]认为，该网站充斥中国网络的极端民族主义情绪和法律明文禁止的“煽动民族仇恨、煽动民族歧视、破坏民族团结”，是违反中华人民共和国法律法规的。”
谁去把它改回来？或加以反驳？
页:
[1]